Accessibility of online services
Verified 29 July 2022 - Directorate for Legal and Administrative Information (Prime Minister)
This page presents the level of accessibility found on the various online services of the Entrepreneur.Service-Public.fr website
The Directorate of Legal and Administrative Information (DILA) pays particular attention to the quality of realization of its websites.
For several years now, it has been engaged in an effort to comply with the RGAA (General Accessibility Framework for Administrations) and to make its websites accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law No 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.
In order to achieve the best possible result, accessibility is taken into account natively in projects by the teams involved in site development. The teams trained in accessibility are also accompanied by third-party experts, notably for auditing, arbitrations and verification of corrections throughout the design and development phases.
This Accessibility Statement is applicable to the "Classified Installation Declaration for Environmental Protection (CEIP)" online service, which is one of the 250 most used online approaches and was completed on November 2, 2021.
Compliance Status
The online service of " Declaration of classified installation for the protection of the environment (DICPE) '''' is partially compliant with the general accessibility improvement repository, RGAA version 4.1, due to the non-conformances listed in the “Test Results” section.
Test Results
The compliance audit carried out by the Interdepartmental Digital Directorate (DINUM) on November 2, 2021, reveals that 75% of the 106 criteria tested are met.
All steps of the process have been verified for compliance:
· Type of return
- Installation (general information)
- Site Activity
- Mode of operation
- Supporting documents
- Summary
- Post-Submission Summary
Inaccessible Content
Below are the main non-conformities of the site.
- Criterion 3.2
- For some web pages, the contrast between text color and background color is not high enough.
- Criterion 5.3
- For some formatting tables, linearized content is not understandable.
- Criterion 5.8
- For some formatting tables, data table elements should not be used.
- Criterion 6.1
- Some links are not explicit.
- Criterion 7.1
- Some scripts are incompatible with assistive technologies.
- Criterion 7.2
- For some scripts that have an alternative, the alternative is irrelevant.
- Criterion 7.4
- For some scripts that initiate a context change, the user is not notified or has no control over it.
- Criterion 8.9
- For some web pages, tags should not be used for presentation purposes only.
- Criterion 10.8
- For some web pages, some hidden content is not intended to be ignored by assistive technologies.
- Criterion 10.11
- For some web pages, content is presented using both vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256px or a width of 320px.
- Criterion 11.3
- For some forms, some labels associated with a form field that has the same function and is repeated several times on the same page or in a set of pages are inconsistent.
- Criterion 11.5
- For some forms, fields of the same type are not grouped, if necessary.
- Criterion 11.9
- For some forms, certain button titles are not relevant.
- Criterion 11.10
- For some forms, certain input controls are not used appropriately.
- Criterion 11.11
- For some forms, some input controls are not accompanied by suggestions to help correct input errors.
- Criterion 11.13
- The purpose of some input fields cannot be inferred to facilitate automatic filling of fields with user data.
- Criterion 12.2
- For some page sets, menus and navigation bars are not always in the same place.
- Criterion 13.3
- For some web pages, some downloadable desktop documents do not have an accessible version.
Technologies used
- HTML5
- CSS
- JavaScript
Test Environment
The content restitution checks were carried out on the basis of the combination provided by the RGAA reference base, with the following versions:
- MacOS Catalina 10.15.7
- Brave 1.29.77 Chromium: 93.0.4577.63
- Firefox 91.0.2
Tools to assess accessibility
- Wave
- HeadingsMap
- Web Developer Chrome extension
- Color Contrast Analyzer
The DILA undertakes to make the Certiphyto approach accessible in accordance with article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.
This accessibility statement applies to the approach " Application for an individual professional certificate for plant protection products (certiphyto or CI-phyto) "
Compliance Status
The online service " Application for an individual professional certificate for plant protection products (certiphyto or CI-phyto) " is in partial compliance with the general accessibility improvement repository due to the non-conformances listed below.
Test Results
Temesis business' compliance audit of RGAA 4.1 found that:
- 80.77% of the RGAA criteria are met.
In detail:
- Number of compliant criteria: 42
- Number of criteria not applicable: 54
- Number of non-compliant criteria: 10
Inaccessible Content
Non-compliance
Non-compliant criteria list:
- 3.3 Are the colors used in the interface components or graphic elements carrying information sufficiently contrasted (except in special cases) on each web page?
- 6.1 Is each link explicit (except in special cases)?
- 7.1 Is each script compatible with assistive technologies, if necessary?
- 10.8 For each web page, are hidden content destined to be ignored by assistive technologies?
- 10.11 For each web page, can content be presented without using both vertical scrolling for a window with a height of 256px, or horizontal scrolling for a window with a width of 320px (except in special cases)?
- 10.12 In each web page, can the text spacing properties be redefined by the user without loss of content or functionality (except in special cases)?
- 11.10 In each form, is the input control used appropriately (except in special cases)?
- 11.11 In each form, is input control accompanied, if necessary, by suggestions to help correct input errors?
- 11.13 Can the purpose of an input field be inferred to facilitate the automatic filling of fields with user data?
- 12.8 Is the tab order consistent on each web page?
Preparation of this accessibility declaration
This statement was issued on December 9, 2021.
Technologies used for the realization of the website
- HTML
- CSS
- Javascript
Test Environment
The web page tests were performed with the following web browser and screen reader combinations:
- NVDA 2021.2, Firefox v94
- NVDA 2021.2, Chrome v96
- Voiceover, Safari, iPhone SE v14.1
The following tools were used during the evaluation:
- WCAG contrast checker
- HeadingsMap
- Web developer
- ARC Toolkit
Pages of the site that have been checked for compliance
- Step 1: My situation
- Step 2: My Personal Information
- Step 3: Address Straightening
- Step 4: Choosing the Certificate
- Step 5: Preparing the Certificate
- Step 6: Supporting Document
- Step 7: Summary
If you encounter an accessibility problem with a content or service, you can contact the website manager to be directed to an accessible alternative or obtain the content in another form.
Send message: referent-accessibilite@dila.gouv.fr
This procedure is to be used if you have reported to the website manager a lack of accessibility that prevents you from accessing any content or services on the website and you have not received a satisfactory response. You can then choose:
- write a message to Defender of Rights
- contact the Defender of Rights delegate in your region
- a telephone number: 09 69 39 00 00
- mail (free, don't put stamp)
Defender of Rights
Free answer 71120
75342 Paris CEDEX 07